Greg Critser and Obesity Arguementative Essay

He believes that stigmatizing over feeding in children leave alone be a feasible theme to end the increasing epizootic of childhood corpulency. However, Critser has several problems linked to his simple solution to a very(prenominal) complex problem. First, Critser doesnt talk ab pop out the discrimination and the rude preaching that throng struggling with corpulency face. Second, he claims Ameri squeeze out families are to foot for this pestiferous, nevertheless really parents are the ones who are held responsible for their childrens preying airs in the first place.Third, by enforcing children to avoid overeating volition only pee-pee kind problems associated with the tension and stress on when and how to eat their aliment. Fourth, parents should dictated an case on how they eat their nutrient, because a child will encounter the same way as how they look into their parents eating. Lastly, by stigmatizing the un healthy behaviors overdue to fleshiness, in acc ordance to, trying not to brand the psyche or people, really is stigmatizing the children who are suffering from creation round.There are umteen variables obscure in the epidemic of childhood obesity that Critser does not recognize, for example the diseases or genetics that are involved with obesity. The feasible solution Critser argues exponent help in the short run with a decrease in childhood obesity, honourable in the long run his solution will not solve the overall epidemic to end childhood obesity. To put one across with, Critser never mentions the discriminating effects and rude treatment that round people deal with the minute they step out in federation.Mary glow Worley begins in her article expand and Happy In Defense of Fat Acceptance explaining what flesh out people go through day to day, and involved are all the emotions and feelings fecund people go through when former(a)(a) people see them. If youve grown up in the twentieth-century Ameri butt socie ty, you in all probability believe that being fat is a serious someoneal, social, and medical liability. much Americans would rather die or cut off a sleeve than be fat, many believe that fatness is a serious health risk, and many are convinced that is a simple matter to overturn ones body size and are so anger by body fat that they believe it is acceptable to shun fat people and make them the butt of cruel jokes. Those who are fat quick learn to be deeply ashamed of their bodies and spend their lives trying to stimulate what they are not and hide what cant be hidden. Our society believes that thinness signals self-discipline and self-respect, whereas fatness signals self-contempt and lack of resolve. 66) Worley goes into depth on round of the thoughts that are running through round peoples mind when going out in society. This is including all adults and children. The discrimination that obese children suffer from is long dogged detrimental effects. These feelings and emo tions that are developed as a child can undertake a vital role in ones self-esteem on with their confidence and how they will conduct themselves day by day. Nowhere is the article Critser talks about the discrimination an obese person has to deal with.Critser would mention some(prenominal) things in his article that would affect the feelings of obese children and one of them was the feeling that obese children deal with is that bosom causes tension (1). The otherwise thing was his solution he thinks that will end the epidemic of obesity, which was, to mark off the behavior of overeating while yet not to rat the person engaged in the behavior. Critser was all wrong in thinking this would truly work around the world and not adept the Westernized countries. In addition, Critser says, No one should be stigmatized for being overweight.But stigmatizing the unhealthful behaviors that cause obesity would conform with what we know about effective health messages (1). He consequent ly goes on to add a nonsensical analogy with the campaigns a fetchst unprotected finish up and smoking. He first is wrong when trying to link obesity with smoking. The both problems are irrelevant to each other besides the fact that both are bad for your health. His focus on unprotected sex and homosexuals in one of his analogies takes offense to anyone who is bigoted, because heterosexuals and homosexuals are the same kind of people with distinguishable interests.People who are bigoted go onto discriminate them. That is a false analogy because what does unprotected sex and too homosexuals have to do with obesity in children. Next, Critsers solution in ways of stigmatizing the unhealthy behaviors associated with obesity and overeating is not the overall solution to conquer this growing epidemic worldwide. The solution is one that may help slow down obesity, but his solution is such a simple solution to such a complex problem. There are many problems associated with obesity alon g with in that respect are many solutions to help conquer childhood obesity.Critser is wrong that society can stigmatize overeating without stigmatizing the person engaging in the behavior. victuals for thought Childrens views on the psychological aspects of childhood obesity in Educational and Child Psychology, Debbie Mansfield and Georgina Doutre discuss the psychological aspects of childhood obesity along with the childrens views and how to protect obese children from stigmatizing effects (23). Children are being stigmatized for being obese.The children are subject to banish stereotyping and discrimination by their peers, and self-esteem issues, negative body image, depressive symptoms (Braet, Calamaro and Waite, Hesketh, Koplan, Miller and Downey 24). This proves that Critsers solution is not going to work. His solution wont work because, when one is trying to stigmatize the behavior of overeating, then the person who is obese is besides subject to the stigmatization. Furthe rmore, the parents also play a vital role when their child is obese. Children learn through what they see especially when they are at a young age.The foot soldiers against obesity is the American family and are needed to put their children on a nutrimentetical restraint to avoid overeating (1). According to Critser, this saying that the American family is a problem to childhood obesity but later says parents arent to blame. Critser uses a strawman tactic saying pressure causes tension by Diamonds. This is straightforward in a sense, but the way Critser uses this saying is that he leaves it at that. He says no more. He doesnt mention anything else about pressure causing tension. He except quotes Diamonds and what they have to say.The tactic works rise in his article, because this is true but it is not linked to his primary solution. childishness obesity could be related to the ignorance or denial of the negative consequences from an various(prenominal) or family perspective (D avidson and Birch 24). Critser may agree with this. On the other hand, parental acceptance and lack of concern regarding weight issues can be a protective factor for the self-esteem of overweight children (Stradmeijer 24). A ruminate on obese children concluded that participants are accepting attitudes and mpathy towards obese children, obese children make their own choices over their own destiny (Mansfield and Doutre 27). There were also negative consequences linked to obesity. Being obese caused a lack of friends for children, more bullying occurred, limited to change sporting activities, and serious health consequences (Mansfield and Doutre 28). Parents can help their children in ways to avoid all these emotional consequences their obese children have to deal with along with the psychological effects it has. Mansfield and Doutre provide a table of childrens views of supportive mechanisms for obesity.Some parental discipline and boost could be for their children to stop loungin g around and do more exercise and eat more fruits and veggies instead of snacks (Mansfield and Doutre 29). A few coping strategies would be to discount it, their personal choice, and avoidance, accordance to that children think its not anybody elses life-time to choose who you want to be and rather skinny or fat it is what you want to be (Mansfield and Doutre 29). Critser thinks that kids assumet know much, when really they search to have an understanding and knowing about the problems associated with obesity.The school systems try to parent exercise to pr thus fart obesity from occurring. It is healthy for children to make their own corroboratory choices. Instead of stigmatizing the behavior of overeating, schools can provide a real effectual background to children. Moreover, Critsers article shows weakness in some separate of the article. Critser included a Pennsylvania state university scholar Barbara Rolls that talked about a study she conducted. Her study noticed that th e three years old children stop eating when they were practiced no matter what the portion size was, but the five year old children devoured everything that was in front of them.Earlier in the article Critser stated that kids dont know when they are full (1). Another weakness that Critser wrote was when he mocked the experts saying that kids have the right to make bad nutritional choices. This doesnt have much support in his paper or evidence along with Critser is comparing two different eras. Nutrition, Health, and Schoolchildren written by Judy Butriss states alternative dietary suggestions whether it refers to healthy snacks to the decrease of food intake in a child. the dietary suggestions include A balanced, varied diet for the entire family, avoiding grazing and TV snacks, healthy snacks (fruits) as alternatives to sweets, chocolate, biscuits, whole food that take time to eat, and grill or boil food instead of frying (Butriss 294). Finally, in Critsers article he uses rigid language and unfair argumentation with rallying crys like gula, foot soldiers, and infantry. Critser uses the enclosure foot soldiers in a way against obesity that we are push button for obesity and not seem to care as much. In a way that foot soldiers can be like foot soldiers that just are taught to march and march and nothing else.Critser sounded bias with this term. He also uses the term infantry. Infantry is referring to the American family along with the term foot soldiers. The two terms go together and act as if the American family just keeps encouraging obesity rather than preventing it. This is unfair argumentation because this is not necessarily true. Critser is being bias in the terms he uses. The last entrap of nonsensical language Critser uses is gluttony where he uses the term twice. The term gluttony can be defined as greedy or exuberant indulgence, and many children with obesity are labeled as gluttonous.In the number 1 of the essay Critser says, needs to p romulgate . . . dietary restraint, something our ancestors knew simply as avoiding gluttony (1). Critser says that no person should be stigmatized for being overweight, but his persuasion is to stigmatize the unhealthy behaviors associate with obesity (Critser 1). This is an unfair argumentation because Critser uses the inconsiderable excogitate gluttony a few times and is also bias to the idea of anti-fat. This is a mistake by using the fully loaded word gluttony, because obese people have enough on their plate and dont need any more judgments that obesity implies.In conclusion, Critsers simple solution to such a complex problem is just not going to work. His claims that stigmatizing the behavior of overeating due to obesity, American families cause obesity, portion control and dietary restraint needs to be enforced, and even never to put a kid on a diet seems to not be supportive enough to back his simple solution. His loaded language use of gluttony causes a problem due to the judgmental attitude it implies. Instead, this causes the many social, physical and even economical problems to rise.When one is obese this does raise the thought of a shortened life span and risks to mental diseases, due to the seclusion, one may receive just for seeing themselves as obese. The parents and school teachers come up with ways children can cope a lot easier with being obese. For example, the ways of exercise, change the behavior in how a child will eat snacks (healthy alternatives), and the knowledge that obese children can gain without the loss of self-esteem and confidence. In the end of it all, Critsers solution to stigmatize the behavior of overeating in a child is the complete revoke approach.